AI agents for supplement and health food quality teams
We build agents that read incoming Certificates of Analysis, check them against your specifications, and prepare batch records for release — with your quality unit signing off on every disposition.
AI, the KEEY GREDIENTS in the success of your quality operations.
Talk to usSee the exception, not just the document
Every result stays beside its method, limit and source, so the reviewer confirms rather than transcribes.
Supplier CoA mapped to your specification
Lot TX-4471, turmeric extract
| Parameter | Method | Specification | Reported | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Identity (botanical) | HPTLC | Conforms to reference | Conforms | In spec |
| Assay, curcuminoids | HPLC | ≥ 95.0 % | 96.4 % | In spec |
| Lead | ICP-MS | ≤ 0.50 ppm | 0.11 ppm | In spec |
| Arsenic | ICP-MS | ≤ 1.00 ppm | 0.28 ppm | In spec |
| Cadmium | ICP-MS | ≤ 0.30 ppm | 0.41 ppm | Out of spec |
| Mercury | ICP-MS | ≤ 0.10 ppm | 0.02 ppm | In spec |
| Total plate count | USP <2021> | ≤ 10,000 cfu/g | 1,300 cfu/g | In spec |
| Yeast and mould | USP <2021> | ≤ 1,000 cfu/g | 40 cfu/g | In spec |
| E. coli | USP <2022> | Absent in 10 g | Absent | In spec |
| Residual ethanol | GC-HS | ≤ 0.50 % | 0.06 % | In spec |
Identity (botanical)
In spec- Specification
- Conforms to reference
- Reported
- Conforms
- Method
- HPTLC
Assay, curcuminoids
In spec- Specification
- ≥ 95.0 %
- Reported
- 96.4 %
- Method
- HPLC
Lead
In spec- Specification
- ≤ 0.50 ppm
- Reported
- 0.11 ppm
- Method
- ICP-MS
Arsenic
In spec- Specification
- ≤ 1.00 ppm
- Reported
- 0.28 ppm
- Method
- ICP-MS
Cadmium
Out of spec- Specification
- ≤ 0.30 ppm
- Reported
- 0.41 ppm
- Method
- ICP-MS
Mercury
In spec- Specification
- ≤ 0.10 ppm
- Reported
- 0.02 ppm
- Method
- ICP-MS
Total plate count
In spec- Specification
- ≤ 10,000 cfu/g
- Reported
- 1,300 cfu/g
- Method
- USP <2021>
Yeast and mould
In spec- Specification
- ≤ 1,000 cfu/g
- Reported
- 40 cfu/g
- Method
- USP <2021>
E. coli
In spec- Specification
- Absent in 10 g
- Reported
- Absent
- Method
- USP <2022>
Residual ethanol
In spec- Specification
- ≤ 0.50 %
- Reported
- 0.06 %
- Method
- GC-HS
One parameter falls outside the specification. The lot stays held until a qualified reviewer decides. The agent does not release it.
The work quality teams actually do
Most of a quality week is reading. Certificates of Analysis arrive from every supplier in a different layout, with different parameter names, different units and different methods, and someone has to sit with each one and check it line by line against the internal specification.
Specifications live in spreadsheets, revisions live in email, and the batch production record runs to hundreds of pages that have to be reviewed before anything ships. The work is careful and repetitive at the same time, which is exactly where attention runs out.
While the review queue sits, finished goods sit with it. Release delays hold inventory, hold cash, and push out ship dates you have already promised to a brand owner.
Incoming CoA review and ingredient release
Identity, potency, heavy metals, microbiological limits, pesticide residues, residual solvents and allergens — read from the supplier document and placed next to your own limits.
- AgentStep 1
Supplier CoA arrives
The document lands by email or in your shared drive, in whatever layout that supplier uses.
- AgentStep 2
Read and extract
Every parameter, method, unit and reported value is pulled from the document, with the source location kept alongside each value.
- AgentStep 3
Map to your specification
Extracted parameters are matched to your internal component specification, including synonyms, unit conversions and method equivalents.
- AgentStep 4
Flag results outside the specification
Each row is marked in spec or out of spec, with the reported value and its source visible so nothing has to be transcribed.
- Qualified reviewerStep 5
Confirm and release the ingredient lot
A qualified person reviews the prepared comparison and makes the release decision. The agent does not release anything.
Batch record review and release
Under cGMP the quality unit reviews the batch production record before release. The agent works the record ahead of the reviewer so review starts from exceptions instead of page one.
- AgentStep 1
Ingest the batch production record
The record is read end to end against the master manufacturing record for that product.
- AgentStep 2
Check completeness
Missing signatures, unsigned verification steps, blank entries and out-of-sequence operations are collected into one exception list.
- AgentStep 3
Reconcile results and deviations
In-process and finished-product results are checked against the specification, and open deviations are surfaced with the steps they touch.
- AgentStep 4
Prepare the review packet
An annotated record is handed over, ordered by exception rather than by page, with links back to each source page.
- Qualified reviewerStep 5
Review and disposition the batch
The quality unit works the exceptions, completes the review and dispositions the batch. Held inventory moves sooner.
Where the agent stops
The agent reads documents, maps them to your specifications and prepares the record.
A qualified person reviews that prepared record and makes every disposition decision.
Every action the agent takes is logged, attributable to a user and a time, and reversible.
Tell us which review is holding your releases, and we will show you the agent on one of your own documents.
Talk to us